2021 Arkansas Cropland Data Layer

Identification_Information:

Citation:

Citation_Information:

Originator:

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Research and Development Division (RDD), Geospatial Information Branch (GIB), Spatial Analysis Research Section (SARS)

Publication_Date: 20220214
Title: 2021 Arkansas Cropland Data Layer | NASS/USDA
Edition: 2021 Edition
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: raster digital data
Publication_Information:

Publication_Place:

USDA, NASS Marketing and Information Services Office, Washington, D.C.

Publisher: USDA, NASS

Other_Citation_Details:

NASS maintains a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ's) section on the CDL website at <https://www.nass.usda.gov/Research_and_Science/Cropland/SARS1a.php>. The data is available free for download through CroplandCROS <https://cropcros.azurewebsites.net/> and CropScape <https://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/>. The data is also available free for download through the Geospatial Data Gateway at <https://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/>.

Online_Linkage: <https://cropcros.azurewebsites.net/>

Description:

Abstract:

The USDA, NASS Cropland Data Layer (CDL) is a raster, geo-referenced, crop-specific land cover data layer. The 2021 CDL has a ground resolution of 30 meters. The CDL is produced using satellite imagery from the Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS sensor, the ISRO ResourceSat-2 LISS-3, and the ESA SENTINEL-2 sensors collected during the current growing season.

Some CDL states used additional satellite imagery and ancillary inputs to supplement and improve the classification. These additional sources can include the United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Elevation Dataset (NED) and the imperviousness data layer from the USGS National Land Cover Database 2019 (NLCD 2019) and the tree canopy data layer from the NLCD 2016.

Agricultural training and validation data are derived from the Farm Service Agency (FSA) Common Land Unit (CLU) Program. The most current version of the NLCD is used as non-agricultural training and validation data.

Please refer to the 'Supplemental_Information' Section of this metadata file for a complete list of all imagery, ancillary data, and training/validation data used to generate this state's CDL.

The strength and emphasis of the CDL is agricultural land cover. Please note that no farmer reported data are derivable from the Cropland Data Layer.

Purpose:

The purpose of the Cropland Data Layer Program is to use satellite imagery to (1) provide planted acreage estimates to the Agricultural Statistics Board for the state's major commodities and (2) produce digital, crop-specific, categorized geo-referenced output products.

Supplemental_Information:

If the following table does not display properly, then please visit the following website to view the original metadata file <https://www.nass.usda.gov/Research_and_Science/Cropland/metadata/meta.php>.

USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2021 Arkansas Cropland Data Layer

CLASSIFICATION INPUTS:
RESOURCESAT-2 LISS-3 20200918 PATH 276
RESOURCESAT-2 LISS-3 20201002 PATH 274
RESOURCESAT-2 LISS-3 20201007 PATH 275
RESOURCESAT-2 LISS-3 20201031 PATH 275
RESOURCESAT-2 LISS-3 20201119 PATH 274
RESOURCESAT-2 LISS-3 20210422 PATH 276
RESOURCESAT-2 LISS-3 20210426 PATH 272
RESOURCESAT-2 LISS-3 20210516 PATH 276
RESOURCESAT-2 LISS-3 20210521 PATH 277
RESOURCESAT-2 LISS-3 20210604 PATH 275
RESOURCESAT-2 LISS-3 20210618 PATH 273
RESOURCESAT-2 LISS-3 20210703 PATH 276
RESOURCESAT-2 LISS-3 20210731 PATH 272
RESOURCESAT-2 LISS-3 20210810 PATH 274
RESOURCESAT-2 LISS-3 20210825 PATH 277

LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20200930 PATH 024
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20201014 PATH 026
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20201016 PATH 024
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20201030 PATH 026
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20201117 PATH 024
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20201126 PATH 023
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20210401 PATH 025
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20210419 PATH 023
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20210426 PATH 024
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20210521 PATH 023
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20210613 PATH 024
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20210620 PATH 025
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20210622 PATH 023
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20210708 PATH 023
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20210713 PATH 026
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20210724 PATH 023
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20210731 PATH 024
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20210809 PATH 023
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20210823 PATH 025
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20210825 PATH 023
LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS TIER1 DATE 20210901 PATH 024

USGS, NATIONAL ELEVATION DATASET
USGS, NATIONAL LAND COVER DATABASE 2016 TREE CANOPY
USGS, NATIONAL LAND COVER DATABASE 2019 IMPERVIOUSNESS
USDA, NASS CROPLAND DATA LAYERS 2015-2020

SENTINEL-2A DATE 20200918 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 069
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20200928 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 069
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20201101 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20201104 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 026
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20201117 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 069
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210420 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210430 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210506 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 069
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210513 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 026
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210520 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210612 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 026
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210615 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 069
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210619 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210622 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 026
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210725 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 069
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210729 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210804 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 069
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210808 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210811 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 026
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210821 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 026
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210824 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 069
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210828 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210831 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 026
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210907 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2A DATE 20210910 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 026

SENTINEL-2B DATE 20200930 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 026
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20201007 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20201013 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 069
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20201017 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20201030 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 026
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20201102 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 069
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20201106 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20210415 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20210614 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20210617 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 026
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20210620 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 069
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20210624 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20210704 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20210707 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 026
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20210714 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20210727 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 026
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20210730 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 069
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20210803 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20210823 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20210902 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126
SENTINEL-2B DATE 20210912 RELATIVE ORBIT NUMBER 126

TRAINING AND VALIDATION:
USDA, FARM SERVICE AGENCY 2021 COMMON LAND UNIT DATA
USGS, NATIONAL LAND COVER DATABASE 2019

NOTE: The final extent of the CDL is clipped to the state boundary even though the raw input data may encompass a larger area.

Time_Period_of_Content:

Time_Period_Information:

Range_of_Dates/Times:

Beginning_Date: 20201001
Ending_Date: 20211231

Currentness_Reference: 2021 growing season

Status:

Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned

Spatial_Domain:

Bounding_Coordinates:

West_Bounding_Coordinate: -94.6182
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -89.7603
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 36.5208
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 32.9695

Keywords:

Theme:

Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category
Theme_Keyword: farming, 001
Theme_Keyword: environment, 007
Theme_Keyword: imageryBaseMapsEarthCover, 010

Theme:

Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords
Theme_Keyword:

Earth Science > Biosphere > Terrestrial Ecosystems > Agricultural Lands

Theme_Keyword: Earth Science > Land Surface > Land Use/Land Cover > Land Cover

Theme:

Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: crop cover
Theme_Keyword: cropland
Theme_Keyword: agriculture
Theme_Keyword: farming
Theme_Keyword: land cover
Theme_Keyword: crop estimates
Theme_Keyword: ISRO ResourceSat-2 LISS-3
Theme_Keyword: ESA SENTINEL-2
Theme_Keyword: Landsat
Theme_Keyword: CroplandCROS
Theme_Keyword: CropScape

Place:

Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords
Place_Keyword: Continent > North America > United States of America > Arkansas

Place:

Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Place_Keyword: Arkansas
Place_Keyword: AR

Temporal:

Temporal_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Temporal_Keyword: 2021

Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:

The USDA, NASS Cropland Data Layer is provided to the public as is and is considered public domain and free to redistribute. The USDA, NASS does not warrant any conclusions drawn from these data. If the user does not have software capable of viewing GEOTIF (.tif) or ERDAS Imagine (.img) file formats then we suggest using CroplandCROS <https://cropcros.azurewebsites.net/> or CropScape <https://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/>.

Point_of_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: USDA, NASS, Spatial Analysis Research Section
Contact_Person: USDA, NASS, Spatial Analysis Research Section staff

Contact_Address:

Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Room 5029 South Building
City: Washington
State_or_Province: District of Columbia
Postal_Code: 20250-2001
Country: USA

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 800-727-9540
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 855-493-0447
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: SM.NASS.RDD.GIB@usda.gov

Data_Set_Credit: USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
Security_Information:

Security_Classification_System: None
Security_Classification: Unclassified
Security_Handling_Description: None

Native_Data_Set_Environment:

Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise; ERDAS Imagine Version 2018 <https://www.hexagongeospatial.com/>; ESRI ArcGIS Version 10.7 <https://www.esri.com/>; Rulequest See5.0 Release 2.11a <http://www.rulequest.com/>; NLCD Mapping Tool version 'NLCD_for_IMAGINE_ver_16_0_0_build_199_2018-09-12' <https://www.mrlc.gov/>.

ERDAS Imagine is used in the pre- and post- processing of all raster-based data. ESRI ArcGIS is used to prepare the vector-based Farm Service Agency (FSA) Common Land Unit (CLU) training and validation data. Rulequest See5.0 is used to create a decision-tree based classifier. The NLCD Mapping Tool is used to apply the See5.0 decision-tree via ERDAS Imagine. This is a departure from older versions of the CDL that were created using in-house software (Peditor) based upon a maximum likelihood classifier approach. Check this section and the 'Process Description' section of the specific state and year metadata file to verify what methodology was used.

Data_Quality_Information:

Attribute_Accuracy:

Attribute_Accuracy_Report:

USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2021 Arkansas Cropland Data Layer
STATEWIDE AGRICULTURAL ACCURACY REPORT

Crop-specific covers only                *Correct   Accuracy      Error      Kappa
-------------------------                 -------   --------     ------      -----
FSA Crops                                 486,824      88.3%      11.7%      0.835

Cover                        Attribute   *Correct Producer's   Omission                User's Commission     Cond'l
Type                              Code     Pixels   Accuracy      Error      Kappa   Accuracy      Error      Kappa
----                              ----     ------   --------      -----      -----   --------      -----      -----
Corn                                 1     63,210      87.8%      12.2%      0.869      94.7%       5.3%      0.943
Cotton                               2     40,620      90.5%       9.5%      0.900      95.2%       4.8%      0.949
Rice                                 3     99,775      91.7%       8.3%      0.907      97.4%       2.6%      0.971
Sorghum                              4      4,856      59.2%      40.8%      0.590      90.0%      10.0%      0.899
Soybeans                             5    243,839      94.2%       5.8%      0.920      90.1%       9.9%      0.866
Sunflower                            6          0       0.0%     100.0%      0.000       0.0%     100.0%      0.000
Peanuts                             10      2,147      72.3%      27.7%      0.722      97.0%       3.0%      0.970
Sweet Corn                          12          0       0.0%     100.0%      0.000       n/a        n/a        n/a
Pop or Orn Corn                     13          5      26.3%      73.7%      0.263     100.0%       0.0%      1.000
Winter Wheat                        24      1,982      55.4%      44.6%      0.553      74.7%      25.3%      0.746
Dbl Crop WinWht/Soybeans            26      8,099      77.4%      22.6%      0.772      82.7%      17.3%      0.825
Oats                                28         59      53.6%      46.4%      0.536      78.7%      21.3%      0.787
Millet                              29          0       0.0%     100.0%      0.000       0.0%     100.0%      0.000
Alfalfa                             36          7      25.0%      75.0%      0.250      26.9%      73.1%      0.269
Other Hay/Non Alfalfa               37      3,058      32.2%      67.8%      0.319      65.2%      34.8%      0.649
Potatoes                            43          0       0.0%     100.0%      0.000       n/a        n/a        n/a
Other Crops                         44          2      50.0%      50.0%      0.500     100.0%       0.0%      1.000
Sweet Potatoes                      46        368      76.5%      23.5%      0.765      98.4%       1.6%      0.984
Watermelons                         48         57      50.0%      50.0%      0.500      96.6%       3.4%      0.966
Cucumbers                           50          0       n/a        n/a        n/a        0.0%     100.0%      0.000
Peas                                53          3      11.1%      88.9%      0.111      75.0%      25.0%      0.750
Tomatoes                            54         11      73.3%      26.7%      0.733      61.1%      38.9%      0.611
Herbs                               57          0       0.0%     100.0%      0.000       0.0%     100.0%      0.000
Sod/Grass Seed                      59        277      58.9%      41.1%      0.589      81.2%      18.8%      0.812
Fallow/Idle Cropland                61     18,175      68.1%      31.9%      0.674      80.3%      19.7%      0.798
Peaches                             67          0       0.0%     100.0%      0.000       0.0%     100.0%      0.000
Grapes                              69          7      63.6%      36.4%      0.636     100.0%       0.0%      1.000
Other Tree Crops                    71          0       0.0%     100.0%      0.000       n/a        n/a        n/a
Pecans                              74        147      30.7%      69.3%      0.307      56.3%      43.7%      0.563
Aquaculture                         92        662      74.6%      25.4%      0.746      89.8%      10.2%      0.898
Open Water                         111     13,741      92.8%       7.2%      0.927      89.9%      10.1%      0.897
Developed/Open Space               121     17,064      99.3%       0.7%      0.993      77.7%      22.3%      0.773
Developed/Low Intensity            122     10,547      99.7%       0.3%      0.997      80.8%      19.2%      0.806
Developed/Med Intensity            123      4,742      99.7%       0.3%      0.997      77.1%      22.9%      0.770
Developed/High Intensity           124      1,629     100.0%       0.0%      1.000      91.0%       9.0%      0.909
Barren                             131        317      26.2%      73.8%      0.261      49.5%      50.5%      0.494
Deciduous Forest                   141     91,207      85.5%      14.5%      0.837      81.9%      18.1%      0.798
Evergreen Forest                   142     77,356      85.4%      14.6%      0.838      79.2%      20.8%      0.771
Mixed Forest                       143     18,431      48.7%      51.3%      0.471      59.8%      40.2%      0.583
Shrubland                          152      5,578      39.2%      60.8%      0.386      60.3%      39.7%      0.597
Grassland/Pasture                  176     69,078      88.5%      11.5%      0.874      80.8%      19.2%      0.791
Woody Wetlands                     190     50,027      83.3%      16.7%      0.822      79.5%      20.5%      0.781
Herbaceous Wetlands                195        308      11.6%      88.4%      0.115      32.8%      67.2%      0.326
Peppers                            216          0       0.0%     100.0%      0.000       n/a        n/a        n/a
Greens                             219          0       0.0%     100.0%      0.000       n/a        n/a        n/a
Plums                              220          0       0.0%     100.0%      0.000       n/a        n/a        n/a
Squash                             222          0       n/a        n/a        n/a        0.0%     100.0%      0.000
Dbl Crop WinWht/Corn               225          3       9.7%      90.3%      0.097      27.3%      72.7%      0.273
Pumpkins                           229          0       0.0%     100.0%      0.000       n/a        n/a        n/a
Dbl Crop WinWht/Sorghum            236          1       2.0%      98.0%      0.020     100.0%       0.0%      1.000
Dbl Crop WinWht/Cotton             238          0       n/a        n/a        n/a        0.0%     100.0%      0.000
Dbl Crop Soybeans/Oats             240        116      46.4%      53.6%      0.464      69.5%      30.5%      0.695
Blueberries                        242          0       0.0%     100.0%      0.000       n/a        n/a        n/a

*Correct Pixels represents the total number of independent validation pixels correctly identified in the error matrix.
**The Overall Accuracy represents only the FSA row crops and annual fruit and vegetables (codes 1-61, 66-80, 92 and 200-255).
FSA-sampled grass and pasture. Non-agricultural and NLCD-sampled categories (codes 62-65, 81-91 and 93-199) are not included in the Overall Accuracy.

The accuracy of the non-agricultural land cover classes within the Cropland Data Layer is entirely dependent upon the USGS, National Land Cover Database. Thus, the USDA, NASS recommends that users consider the NLCD for studies involving non-agricultural land cover. For more information on the accuracy of the NLCD please reference <https://www.mrlc.gov/>.

Quantitative_Attribute_Accuracy_Assessment:

Attribute_Accuracy_Value:

Classification accuracy is generally 85% to 95% correct for the major crop-specific land cover categories. See the 'Attribute Accuracy Report' section of this metadata file for the detailed accuracy report.

Attribute_Accuracy_Explanation:

The strength and emphasis of the CDL is crop-specific land cover categories. The accuracy of the CDL non-agricultural land cover classes is entirely dependent upon the USGS, National Land Cover Database. Thus, the USDA, NASS recommends that users consider the NLCD for studies involving non-agricultural land cover.

These definitions of accuracy statistics were derived from the following book: Congalton, Russell G. and Kass Green. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, Inc. 1999. The 'Producer's Accuracy' is calculated for each cover type in the ground truth and indicates the probability that a ground truth pixel will be correctly mapped (across all cover types) and measures 'errors of omission'. An 'Omission Error' occurs when a pixel is excluded from the category to which it belongs in the validation dataset. The 'User's Accuracy' indicates the probability that a pixel from the CDL classification actually matches the ground truth data and measures 'errors of commission'. The 'Commission Error' represent when a pixel is included in an incorrect category according to the validation data. It is important to take into consideration errors of omission and commission. For example, if you classify every pixel in a scene to 'wheat', then you have 100% Producer's Accuracy for the wheat category and 0% Omission Error. However, you would also have a very high error of commission as all other crop types would be included in the incorrect category. The 'Kappa' is a measure of agreement based on the difference between the actual agreement in the error matrix (i.e., the agreement between the remotely sensed classification and the reference data as indicated by the major diagonal) and the chance agreement which is indicated by the row and column totals. The 'Conditional Kappa Coefficient' is the agreement for an individual category within the entire error matrix.

Logical_Consistency_Report:

The Cropland Data Layer (CDL) has been produced using training and independent validation data from the Farm Service Agency (FSA) Common Land Unit (CLU) Program (agricultural data) and United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Land Cover Database (NLCD). More information about the FSA CLU Program can be found at <https://www.fsa.usda.gov/>. More information about the NLCD can be found at <https://www.mrlc.gov/>. The CDL encompasses the entire state unless noted otherwise in the 'Completeness Report' section of this metadata file.

Completeness_Report: The entire state is covered by the Cropland Data Layer.
Positional_Accuracy:

Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:

Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:

The Cropland Data Layer retains the spatial attributes of the input imagery. The Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS imagery was obtained via download from the USGS Global Visualization Viewer (Glovis) website <https://glovis.usgs.gov/>. Please reference the metadata on the Glovis website for each Landsat scene for positional accuracy. The majority of the Landsat data is available at Level 1T (precision and terrain corrected).

Lineage:

Source_Information:

Source_Citation:

Citation_Information:

Originator: Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO)
Publication_Date: 2021
Title: ResourceSat-2 LISS-3
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:

Publication_Place:

Indian Space Research Organisation HQ, Department of Space, Government of India Antariksh Bhavan, New BEL Road, Bangalore 560 231

Publisher: Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO)

Other_Citation_Details:

The ISRO ResourceSat-2 LISS-3 satellite sensor operates in four spectral bands at a spatial resolution of 24 meters. Additional information about the data can be obtained at <https://www.isro.gov.in/>. Refer to the 'Supplemental Information' Section of this metadata file for specific scene date, path, row and quadrants used as classification inputs. For the 2021 CDL Program, the imagery was resampled to 30 meters to match the Landsat spatial resolution. The resample used cubic convolution, rigorous transformation.

Source_Scale_Denominator: 24 meter
Type_of_Source_Media: online download
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:

Time_Period_Information:

Range_of_Dates/Times:

Beginning_Date: 20201001
Ending_Date: 20211231

Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: LISS-3
Source_Contribution: Raw data used in land cover spectral signature analysis

Source_Information:

Source_Citation:

Citation_Information:

Originator: European Space Agency (ESA)
Publication_Date: 2021
Title: SENTINEL-2
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:

Publication_Place: European Commission, Brussels (Belgium)
Publisher: Copernicus - European Commission

Other_Citation_Details:

The ESA SENTINEL-2 satellite sensor operates in twelve spectral bands at spatial resolutions varying from 10 to 60 meters. Additional information about the data can be obtained at <http://www.esa.int/>. Refer to the 'Supplemental Information' Section of this metadata file for specific scene date, path, row and quadrants used as classification inputs. For the 2021 CDL Program, the imagery was resampled to 30 meters to match the Landsat spatial resolution. The resample used cubic convolution, rigorous transformation.

Source_Scale_Denominator: 10 meter
Type_of_Source_Media: online download
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:

Time_Period_Information:

Range_of_Dates/Times:

Beginning_Date: 20201001
Ending_Date: 20211231

Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: SENTINEL-2
Source_Contribution: Raw data used in land cover spectral signature analysis

Source_Information:

Source_Citation:

Citation_Information:

Originator:

United States Geological Survey (USGS), Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS)

Publication_Date: 2021
Title:

Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager and Thermal Infrared Sensor (OLI/TIRS)

Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:

Publication_Place: Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57198-001
Publisher: USGS, EROS

Other_Citation_Details:

The Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS data are free for download through the following website <https://glovis.usgs.gov/>. Additional information about Landsat data can be obtained at <https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros>. Refer to the 'Supplemental Information' Section of this metadata file for specific scene date, path and rows used as classification inputs.

Source_Scale_Denominator: 30 meter
Type_of_Source_Media: online download
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:

Time_Period_Information:

Range_of_Dates/Times:

Beginning_Date: 20201001
Ending_Date: 20211231

Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Landsat 8
Source_Contribution: Raw data used in land cover spectral signature analysis

Source_Information:

Source_Citation:

Citation_Information:

Originator:

United States Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Data Center

Publication_Date: 2009
Title: The National Elevation Dataset (NED)
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:

Publication_Place: Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57198 USA
Publisher: USGS, EROS Data Center

Other_Citation_Details:

The USGS NED Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is used as an ancillary data source in the production of the Cropland Data Layer. More information on the USGS NED can be found at <https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/national-geospatial-program/national-map>. Refer to the 'Supplemental Information' Section of this metadata file for the complete list of ancillary data sources used as classification inputs.

Source_Scale_Denominator: 30 meter
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:

Time_Period_Information:

Single_Date/Time:

Calendar_Date: unknown

Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NED
Source_Contribution:

spatial and attribute information used in land cover spectral signature analysis

Source_Information:

Source_Citation:

Citation_Information:

Originator:

United States Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Data Center

Publication_Date: 2021
Title: National Land Cover Database 2019 (NLCD 2019)
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:

Publication_Place: Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57198 USA
Publisher: USGS, EROS Data Center

Other_Citation_Details:

The NLCD 2019 land cover was used as ground training and validation for non-agricultural categories. Additionally, the USGS NLCD 2019 Imperviousness layer was used as ancillary data sources in the Cropland Data Layer classification process. The Tree Canopy data was not available with the NLCD 2019, so the NLCD 2016 Tree Canopy data was used as an ancillary input. More information on the NLCD can be found at <https://www.mrlc.gov/>. Refer to the 'Supplemental Information' Section of this metadata file for the complete list of ancillary data sources used as classification inputs.

Source_Scale_Denominator: 30 meter
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:

Time_Period_Information:

Single_Date/Time:

Calendar_Date: unknown

Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NLCD
Source_Contribution: Raw data used in land cover spectral signature analysis

Source_Information:

Source_Citation:

Citation_Information:

Originator:

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Farm Service Agency (FSA)

Publication_Date: 2021
Title: USDA, FSA Common Land Unit (CLU)
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:

Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah 84119-2020 USA
Publisher: USDA, FSA Aerial Photography Field Office

Other_Citation_Details:

Access to the USDA, Farm Service Agency (FSA) Common Land Unit (CLU) digital data set is currently limited to FSA and Agency partnerships. During the current growing season, producers enrolled in FSA programs report their growing intentions, crops and acreage to USDA Field Service Centers. Their field boundaries are digitized in a standardized GIS data layer and the associated attribute information is maintained in a database known as 578 Administrative Data. This CLU/578 dataset provides a comprehensive and robust agricultural training and validation data set for the Cropland Data Layer. Additional information about the CLU Program can be found at <https://www.fsa.usda.gov/>.

Source_Scale_Denominator: 4800
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:

Time_Period_Information:

Single_Date/Time:

Calendar_Date: 2021

Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition, updated annually

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: FSA CLU
Source_Contribution:

spatial and attribute information used in the spectral signature training and validation of agricultural land cover

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

OVERVIEW: FOR MORE TECHNICAL DETAILS AND PROGRAM HISTORY: <https://www.nass.usda.gov/Research_and_Science/Cropland/sarsfaqs2.php> The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) Cropland Data Layer (CDL) Program is a unique agricultural-specific land cover geospatial product that is produced annually in participating states. The CDL Program builds upon NASS' traditional crop acreage estimation program and integrates Farm Service Agency (FSA) grower-reported field data with satellite imagery to create an unbiased statistical estimator of crop area at the state and county level for internal use. It is important to note that the internal acreage estimates, most closely aligned with planted acres, produced using the CDL are not simple pixel counting. It is more of an 'Adjusted Census by Satellite.'

SOFTWARE: ERDAS Imagine is used in the pre- and post- processing of all raster-based data. ESRI ArcGIS is used to prepare the vector-based training and validation data. Rulequest See5.0 is used to create a decision tree based classifier. The NLCD Mapping Tool is used to apply the See5.0 decision-tree via ERDAS Imagine.

DECISION TREE CLASSIFIER: This Cropland Data Layer used the decision tree classifier approach. Using a decision tree classifier is a departure from older versions of the CDL which were created using in-house software (Peditor) based upon a maximum likelihood classifier approach. Decision trees offer several advantages over the more traditional maximum likelihood classification method. The advantages include being: 1) non-parametric by nature and thus not reliant on the assumption of the input data being normally distributed, 2) efficient to construct and thus capable of handling large and complex data sets, 3) able to incorporate missing and non-continuous data, and 4) able to sort out non-linear relationships.

GROUND TRUTH: As with the maximum likelihood method, decision tree analysis is a supervised classification technique. Thus, it relies on having a sample of known ground truth areas in which to train the classifier. Older versions of the CDL (prior to 2006) utilized ground truth data from the annual June Agricultural Survey (JAS). Beginning in 2006, the CDL utilizes the very comprehensive ground truth data provided from the FSA Common Land Unit (CLU) Program as a replacement for the JAS data. The FSA CLU data have the advantage of natively being in a GIS and containing magnitudes more of field level information. Disadvantages include that it is not truly a probability sample of land cover and has bias toward subsidized program crops. Additional information about the FSA data can be found at <https://www.fsa.usda.gov/>. The most current version of the NLCD is used as non-agricultural training and validation data.

INPUTS: The CDL is produced using satellite imagery from the Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS sensor, the ISRO ResourceSat-2 LISS-3, and the ESA SENTINEL-2 sensors collected during the current growing season. Some CDL states used additional satellite imagery and ancillary inputs to supplement and improve the classification. These additional sources can include the United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Elevation Dataset (NED) and the imperviousness data layer from the USGS National Land Cover Database 2019 (NLCD 2019) and the tree canopy data layer from the NLCD 2016. Please refer to the 'Supplemental_Information' Section of this metadata file for a complete list of all imagery and ancillary data used to generate this state's CDL.

ACCURACY: The accuracy of the land cover classifications are evaluated using independent validations data sets generated from the FSA CLU data (agricultural categories) and the NLCD (non-agricultural categories). The Producer's Accuracy is generally 85% to 95% correct for the major crop-specific land cover categories. See the 'Attribute Accuracy Report' section of this metadata file for the full accuracy report.

PUBLIC RELEASE: The USDA, NASS Cropland Data Layer is considered public domain and free to redistribute. The official website is <https://www.nass.usda.gov/Research_and_Science/Cropland/SARS1a.php>. The data is available free for download through CroplandCROS <https://cropcros.azurewebsites.net/>, CropScape <https://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/> and the Geospatial Data Gateway <https://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/>. Please note that in no case are farmer reported data revealed or derivable from the public use Cropland Data Layer.

Process_Date: 2021
Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: USDA, NASS, Spatial Analysis Research Section
Contact_Person: USDA, NASS, Spatial Analysis Research Section staff

Contact_Address:

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 800-727-9540
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 855-493-0447
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: SM.NASS.RDD.GIB@usda.gov

Cloud_Cover: 0

Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:

Indirect_Spatial_Reference: Arkansas
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Raster
Raster_Object_Information:

Raster_Object_Type: Pixel
Row_Count: 13013
Column_Count: 14924

Spatial_Reference_Information:

Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:

Planar:

Map_Projection:

Map_Projection_Name:

Albers Conical Equal Area as used by mrlc.gov (NLCD). FOR GEOSPATIAL DATA GATEWAY USERS: Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), Spheroid WGS84, Datum WGS84. Due to technical restrictions, the online data available free for download through the Geospatial Data Gateway <https://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/> can only be offered in UTM.

Albers_Conical_Equal_Area:

Standard_Parallel: 29.500000
Standard_Parallel: 45.500000
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -96.000000
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 23.000000
False_Easting: 0.000000
False_Northing: 0.000000

Planar_Coordinate_Information:

Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: row and column
Coordinate_Representation:

Abscissa_Resolution: 30
Ordinate_Resolution: 30

Planar_Distance_Units: meters

Geodetic_Model:

Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid_Name: Geodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.000000

Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257223563

Entity_and_Attribute_Information:

Overview_Description:

Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:

The Cropland Data Layer (CDL) is produced using agricultural training data from the Farm Service Agency (FSA) Common Land Unit (CLU) Program and non-agricultural training data from the most current version of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Land Cover Database (NLCD). The strength and emphasis of the CDL is crop-specific land cover categories. The accuracy of the CDL non-agricultural land cover classes are entirely dependent upon the NLCD. Thus, the USDA, NASS recommends that users consider the NLCD for studies involving non-agricultural land cover.

Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:

 Data Dictionary: USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2021 Cropland Data Layer

 Source: USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

 The following is a cross reference list of the categorization codes and land covers.
 Note that not all land cover categories listed below will appear in an individual state.

 Raster
 Attribute Domain Values and Definitions: NO DATA, BACKGROUND 0

 Categorization Code   Land Cover
         "0"       Background

 Raster
 Attribute Domain Values and Definitions: CROPS 1-60

 Categorization Code   Land Cover
           "1"       Corn
           "2"       Cotton
           "3"       Rice
           "4"       Sorghum
           "5"       Soybeans
           "6"       Sunflower
          "10"       Peanuts
          "11"       Tobacco
          "12"       Sweet Corn
          "13"       Pop or Orn Corn
          "14"       Mint
          "21"       Barley
          "22"       Durum Wheat
          "23"       Spring Wheat
          "24"       Winter Wheat
          "25"       Other Small Grains
          "26"       Dbl Crop WinWht/Soybeans
          "27"       Rye
          "28"       Oats
          "29"       Millet
          "30"       Speltz
          "31"       Canola
          "32"       Flaxseed
          "33"       Safflower
          "34"       Rape Seed
          "35"       Mustard
          "36"       Alfalfa
          "37"       Other Hay/Non Alfalfa
          "38"       Camelina
          "39"       Buckwheat
          "41"       Sugarbeets
          "42"       Dry Beans
          "43"       Potatoes
          "44"       Other Crops
          "45"       Sugarcane
          "46"       Sweet Potatoes
          "47"       Misc Vegs & Fruits
          "48"       Watermelons
          "49"       Onions
          "50"       Cucumbers
          "51"       Chick Peas
          "52"       Lentils
          "53"       Peas
          "54"       Tomatoes
          "55"       Caneberries
          "56"       Hops
          "57"       Herbs
          "58"       Clover/Wildflowers
          "59"       Sod/Grass Seed
          "60"       Switchgrass

 Raster
 Attribute Domain Values and Definitions: NON-CROP 61-65

 Categorization Code   Land Cover
          "61"       Fallow/Idle Cropland
          "63"       Forest
          "64"       Shrubland
          "65"       Barren

 Raster
 Attribute Domain Values and Definitions: CROPS 66-80

 Categorization Code   Land Cover
          "66"       Cherries
          "67"       Peaches
          "68"       Apples
          "69"       Grapes
          "70"       Christmas Trees
          "71"       Other Tree Crops
          "72"       Citrus
          "74"       Pecans
          "75"       Almonds
          "76"       Walnuts
          "77"       Pears

 Raster
 Attribute Domain Values and Definitions: OTHER 81-109

 Categorization Code   Land Cover
          "81"       Clouds/No Data
          "82"       Developed
          "83"       Water
          "87"       Wetlands
          "88"       Nonag/Undefined
          "92"       Aquaculture

 Raster
 Attribute Domain Values and Definitions: NLCD-DERIVED CLASSES 110-195

 Categorization Code   Land Cover
         "111"       Open Water
         "112"       Perennial Ice/Snow
         "121"       Developed/Open Space
         "122"       Developed/Low Intensity
         "123"       Developed/Med Intensity
         "124"       Developed/High Intensity
         "131"       Barren
         "141"       Deciduous Forest
         "142"       Evergreen Forest
         "143"       Mixed Forest
         "152"       Shrubland
         "176"       Grassland/Pasture
         "190"       Woody Wetlands
         "195"       Herbaceous Wetlands

 Raster
 Attribute Domain Values and Definitions: CROPS 195-255

 Categorization Code   Land Cover
         "204"       Pistachios
         "205"       Triticale
         "206"       Carrots
         "207"       Asparagus
         "208"       Garlic
         "209"       Cantaloupes
         "210"       Prunes
         "211"       Olives
         "212"       Oranges
         "213"       Honeydew Melons
         "214"       Broccoli
         "215"       Avocados
         "216"       Peppers
         "217"       Pomegranates
         "218"       Nectarines
         "219"       Greens
         "220"       Plums
         "221"       Strawberries
         "222"       Squash
         "223"       Apricots
         "224"       Vetch
         "225"       Dbl Crop WinWht/Corn
         "226"       Dbl Crop Oats/Corn
         "227"       Lettuce
         "228"       Dbl Crop Triticale/Corn
         "229"       Pumpkins
         "230"       Dbl Crop Lettuce/Durum Wht
         "231"       Dbl Crop Lettuce/Cantaloupe
         "232"       Dbl Crop Lettuce/Cotton
         "233"       Dbl Crop Lettuce/Barley
         "234"       Dbl Crop Durum Wht/Sorghum
         "235"       Dbl Crop Barley/Sorghum
         "236"       Dbl Crop WinWht/Sorghum
         "237"       Dbl Crop Barley/Corn
         "238"       Dbl Crop WinWht/Cotton
         "239"       Dbl Crop Soybeans/Cotton
         "240"       Dbl Crop Soybeans/Oats
         "241"       Dbl Crop Corn/Soybeans
         "242"       Blueberries
         "243"       Cabbage
         "244"       Cauliflower
         "245"       Celery
         "246"       Radishes
         "247"       Turnips
         "248"       Eggplants
         "249"       Gourds
         "250"       Cranberries
         "254"       Dbl Crop Barley/Soybeans

2021 Arkansas Cropland Data Layer | NASS/USDA

Metadata: